According to @glassnode, Bitcoin (BTC) is stuck in a fragile range as heavy overhead supply, rising realized losses, and weakening demand are capping recovery attempts, source: Glassnode Week On-Chain https://glassno.de/49hCwQH. This structure favors selling into strength and range trading until demand re-accelerates and realized loss metrics cool, with any upside breakout requiring absorption of overhead supply at resistance, source: Glassnode Week On-Chain https://glassno.de/49hCwQH. Traders should monitor on-chain realized loss trends and demand proxies flagged by Glassnode to gauge when recovery odds improve, source: Glassnode Week On-Chain https://glassno.de/49hCwQH.

According to @glassnode, The Bitcoin Vector #33 is presented by Glassnode and built by Swissblock in collaboration with Willy Woo, confirming the provenance of this Bitcoin (BTC) report. Source: @glassnode. The announcement credits Swissblock and Willy Woo for construction and identifies Glassnode as presenter, establishing authorship and publication for traders referencing this Bitcoin-focused edition. Source: @glassnode.

According to the source, Ethereum ETH holders move and sell their coins far more than Bitcoin BTC holders, based on on-chain spending activity and coin age distribution observed by Glassnode, indicating higher transactional turnover on ETH relative to BTC, source: Glassnode. Glassnode notes that BTC long-term holder supply remains near historical highs while coin turnover is lower than ETH, underscoring stronger holding behavior in BTC versus more trading-driven flows in ETH, source: Glassnode. For trading, Glassnode associates elevated short-term holder activity and higher spending frequency with greater near-term volatility, suggesting ETH price tends to react faster to liquidity shocks than BTC, source: Glassnode. Glassnode highlights monitoring exchange net flows, realized profit and loss, and short-term holder supply share to time entries and exits when ETH activity accelerates versus BTC, source: Glassnode.